Bioprospecting of an Indigeneous Bacillus thuringiensis Strain G5-8-3T02 for Shrimp Culture System

Main Article Content

Caroline Nchedo Ariole
Euphemia Uchechi Agulanna


Aim: An indigenous Bacillus thuringiensis strain G5-8-3T02 earlier isolated from healthy shrimp intestine and established to safeguard Penaeus monodon from Vibrio mimicus infection was assessed as a potential candidate bacterium for drug enhancement for shrimp culture systems.

Methodology: Optimal temperature, pH and salinity for growth and antibacterial activity of Bacillus thuringiensis against Vibrio mimicus were determined. The effects of enzymes (pepsin, catalase, lipase and α- amylase), pH (2-9), heat (37°C – 121°C) and surfactants (Sodium dodecyl sulphate and Tween 80) on antibacterial activity were also evaluated. Cell growth and antibacterial activity were monitored daily for 5 days via spectrophotometric method at 600 nm and agar well diffusion assay respectively. The metabolite extracted with methanol was analyzed for bioactive compounds using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS).

Results: The optimum temperature, pH and salinity for growth and metabolite production were 35°C, pH 6-7 and 10-15 ppt. respectively. The crude extract did not totally lose its activity when treated with enzymes, various pH values, heat and surfactants. The quantitative composition of the metabolite revealed 15 bioactive compounds. The main compound produced was 2, 6, 10-Trimethyltridecane with peak area of 14.58%.

Conclusion: The non-pathogenic, antagonistic, indigenous Bacillus thuringiensis strain G5-8-3T02 could be engaged in the management of vibriosis in shrimp culture since the use of antibiotics in aquaculture for disease control yields objectionable effects. The identified bioactive compounds might be valuable for drug development for shrimp culture system.

Shrimp culture, antibacterial activity, bioactive compounds, metabolite

Article Details

How to Cite
Ariole, C. N., & Agulanna, E. U. (2020). Bioprospecting of an Indigeneous Bacillus thuringiensis Strain G5-8-3T02 for Shrimp Culture System. South Asian Journal of Research in Microbiology, 6(1), 33-43.
Original Research Article


Stentiford GD, Neil DM, Peeler EJ, Shields JD, Small HJ, Flegel TW, Viak JM, Jones B, Morado F, Moss S, Lotz J, Bartholomay L, Behringer DC, Hauton C, Lightner DV. Disease will limit future food supply from the global crustacean fishery and aquaculture sectors. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2012;110(2):141-157.

Tall A, Hervio-Heath D, Teillon A, Boisset-Helbert C, Delesmont R, Bodilis J, Touron-Bodilis A. Diversity of Vibrio spp. isolated at ambient environmental temperature in the Eastern English Channel as determined by pyrH sequencing. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2013;114:1713—1724.

Cui J, Fan XT, Liu WZ, Li HY, Zhou YC, Wang SF, Xie ZY. Isolation and identification of vibriosis pathogens of marine cultured fishes in southern China. Nat Sci J HaiNan Univ. 2014;32: 244–251.

Bondad-Reantaso MG, Subasinghe RP, Arthur JR, Ogawa K, Chinabut S., Adlard R., Tan Z, Shariff M. Disease and health management in Asian Aquaculture. Veterinary Parasitology. 2005;132:249-272.

Ariole CN, Anyanwu NG. Efficiency of indigenous Pseudomonas aeruginosa as Biocontrol Agent against Vibrio infection in shrimp (Penaeus monodon) culture. International Journal of Aquaculture. 2017; 7(3):15-22.

Anyanwu NG, Ariole CN. Probiotic potential of an indigenous marine Bacillus thuringiensis on shrimp (Penaeus monodon) culture infected with Vibrio mimicus. J. Applied Sci. 2019;19:173-179.

Elmahdi S, DaSilva LV, Parveen S. Antibiotic resistance of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus in various countries: A review. Food Microbiol. 2016; 57:128–134.

Balcázar JL, Blas I, Ruiz-Zarzuela I, Cunningham D, Vendrell D, Múzquiz JL. The role of probiotics in aquaculture. Vet Microbiol. 2006;114:173–186.

Verschuere L, Rombaut G, Sorgeloos P, Verstraete W. Probiotic as biological control agents in aquaculture. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Review. 2000;64: 655-671.

Irianto A, Austin B. Probiotics in aquaculture. J. Fish Dis. 2002;25:633-642.

Laatsch H. Marine bacterial metabolites. In: Proksch P, Muller WEG. Editors. Frontiers in Marine Biotechnology. Horizon Bioscience, Norfolk, UK. 2006; 225–288.

Jha RK, Zi-rong X. Biomedical compounds from marine organisms. Marine Drugs. 2004;2:123–146.

Rengpipat S, Rukpratanporn S, Piyatiratitivorakul S, Menasaveta P. Immunity enhancement in black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) by a probiont bacterium (Bacillus S11). Aquaculture. 2000;191:271-288.

Fu SZ, Song BB, Liu Y, Liu ZP. Screening of probiotic strains and their protection against vibriosis in juvenile shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). China Environ Sci. 2009;29:867–872.

Ariole CN, Aungwa QC. The effect of indigenous probiont on the growth of shrimp (Penaeus monodon) pathogen. Journal of Research in Microbes. 2013; 2(1):105-110.

Kumari A, Akkoç N, Akçelik M. Purification and partial characterization of bacteriocin produced by Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis LL171. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012; 28:1647-1655.

Maria GL, Sridhar KR, Raviraja NS. Antimicrobial and enzymatic activity of mangrove endophytic fungi of South West coast of India. Journal of Agricultural Technology. 2005;1: 67-80.

Balcazar JL, Rojas-Luna T. Inhibitory activity of probiotic Bacillus subtilis UTM126 against Vibrio species confers protection against vibriosis in juvenile shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Current Microbiology. 2007;55:409-412.

Gatesoupe FJ. The use of probiotics in aquaculture. Aquaculture. 1999;180:147-165.

Ariole CN, Onwudiwe EON, Okpokwasili GSC. Diversity and antibacterial potential of culturable coastal marine bacteria. J Glob Eco Environ. 2017;6(4):149-159.

Rampelotto PH. Resistance of microorganisms to extreme environmental conditions and its contribution to astrobiology. Sustainability. 2010;2:1602–1623.

Mukesh Kumar DJ, Krishnaveni K, Balakumaran MD, Ramesh S, Kalaichelvan PT. Production and optimization of extracellular alkaline protease from Bacillus subtilis isolated from dairy effluent, Der Pharmacia Lettre. 2012;4(1):98-109.

Chythanya R, Karunasagar I, Karunasagar I. Inhibition of shrimp pathogenic Vibrios by a marine Pseudomonas 1-2.Aquaculture. 2002;208:1-10.

Vijayan KK, Singh BIS, Jayaprakash NS, Alavandi SV, Pai SS, Preetha R, Pajan JJS, Santiago TC. A brackish water isolate of Pseudomonas PS–102, a potential antagonistic bacterium against pathogenic Vibrio in penaeid and non-penaeid rearing systems. Aquaculture. 2006;251:192- 200.

Gao XY, Liu Y, Mao LL, Li EW, Hou TT, Liu ZP. Mechanism of anti-Vibrio activity of marine probiotic strain Bacillus pumilus H2, and characterization of the active substance. AMB Express. 2017;7: 23.

Baruzzi F, Quintieri L, Morea M, Caputo L. Antimicrobial compounds produced by Bacillus spp. and applications in food. In: Vilas AM. (ed). Science against Microbial Pathogens: Communicating Current Research and Technological Advances. Formatex; Badajoz, Spain. 2011;1102–1111.