Breaking the Diagnostic Enigma: Brucella Infection in the Spectrum of Pyrexia of Unknown Origin at a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India
Pratima Rawat
Department of Microbiology, SGPGI, Lucknow, UP, India and Department of Microbiology, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, UP, India.
Raj Kumar Kalyan *
Department of Microbiology, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, UP, India.
Shreya Mahesh
Department of Microbiology, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, UP, India.
Asmat Jahan
Department of Microbiology, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, UP, India.
Sheetal Verma
Department of Microbiology, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, UP, India.
Amita Jain
Department of Microbiology, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, UP, India.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Background: Brucellosis is a neglected zoonotic infection that poses significant public health concerns. It is endemic in various regions of Asia, notably in India. It contributes to pyrexia of unknown origin and has the potential to cause life-threatening multisystem disease.
Objectives: The focus of this work was to diagnose brucellosis by IgM/IgG ELISA.
Methods: A total of 94 serum samples were collected and processed for screening of brucella by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay.
Results: Human brucellosis was prevalent in a study of 94 individuals with suspected Pyrexia of Unknown Origin (PUO), with diverse infectious causes identified. The diagnostic success rate was 61.7%, and Brucella-positive cases (mean age 34.08±15.14) were more common in males (69.2%) and rural individuals (61.5%), particularly farmers/unskilled laborers and housewives. The Orthopedics/Rheumatology ward exhibited a higher prevalence (53.8%), with clinical manifestations including pyrexia, arthralgia, anemia, backache, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, and thrombocytopenia/thrombocytosis. PCR analysis identified one B. abortus case (1.1%), and serological/molecular analyses revealed distinct patterns, including solely IgG positive (3.2%), solely IgM positive (9.6%), and positivity for both IgM and PCR (1.1%).
Conclusion: The potential for unusual clinical presentation and the low titers of serologic reactivity remind us that brucellosis remains a diagnostic challenge that requires clinical suspicion and thorough evaluation.
Keywords: Brucella, seroprevalence, IgM ELISA, IgG ELISA, arthralgia, PUO